I suspect there’s not many in the online poly or poly-friendly community yesterday that didn’t read the debacle of an “article” posted by CNN from Oprah.com author Karen Salmansohn. If you didn’t, I’ll include a link in the Further Reading section at the end of my post.
The basic gist? Salmansohn was propositioned to participate in an open marriage. She decided it wasn’t for her.
In the normal world, this would not be the stuff headlines are made of. Unfortunately, when PR gets passed off as journalism, the lines blur. Salmansohn’s goal in writing the piece was singular: it was not to share her story or to educate her reader. It was to sell her book.
She mentions “research” that she has done to arrive at her conclusion, but most of the article deals with either (a) her own personal experience, or (b) her book content. She does reference one statistic on the success rate of open marriages:
“It was surprisingly difficult to find statistics on whether open marriages work. Ironically, open marriage isn’t something we talk about all that openly. Some research suggests that open marriage has a 92 percent failure rate. Steve Brody, Ph.D., a psychologist in Cambria, California, explains that less than 1 percent of married people are in open marriages.”
You’ve really got to be careful when you toss things like that out. Mostly because it makes people like me immediately log in to see exactly what academic research is available.
Running a quick Academic Search Complete query on “open marriages” turns up four peer-reviewed articles, two of which are relevant to the question at hand. (One of the others was on therapist values as relevant to providing therapy, and the other on evolution of family units.)
Rubin and Adams published “Outcomes of Open Marriages” in 1986 in The Journal of Sex Research. They found no difference in the stability of open marriages to traditional ones. Which brings up an important point: saying open marriage doesn’t work implies that “traditional” marriage does.
The National Vital Statistics Report from July 29, 2009 tells us that the divorce rate in America in 2008 was about 49%:
Number of marriages: 2,162,000
Marriage rate: 7.1 per 1,000 total population
Divorce rate: 3.5 per 1,000 population (44 reporting States and D.C.)
Clearly government-sanctioned marriage in the United States isn’t faring that well either.
Knapp published “An Exploratory Study of 17 Open Marriages” earlier in 1976, also in The Journal of Sex Research. It was not, by the author’s own admission, scientifically rigorous. Rather it was a tentative exploration into an area that otherwise was rather dark, research-wise. One of the interesting things about the Knapp study was that many of the couples would be defined as polyamorous in today’s terminology instead of simply “open”. Which is another strike against Salmansohn: she assumes all open marriages are created equal, and are equally created solely about meeting the sexual needs of one or both partners in the relationship (and implies that that partner is typically the male).
I will go ahead and get this out of the way: like Salmansohn, I am single. Not married. Never have been. It is completely acceptable for me to discuss marriage with you from an objective, scientific point of view. It is completely acceptable for me to comment on my view of most of the open relationships that I have observed (which for the most part appear to be going quite well – a few are struggling as any “normal” couple does from time to time) – as long as I am doing so informally. It is not acceptable for me to take the limited sample set of relationships that I have been exposed to as a valid sample of all such relationships. It is also not acceptable for me to take my personal viewpoint – which is not even anchored in participating in a marriage – and pass that off as relevant to anyone except myself. As I alluded in my last blog post, our diversity is what makes us beautiful.
We don’t all need to take the same road to happiness. We just need to get there, and we need to keep the roads open for others.
When we develop moral arguments against lifestyles we do not understand or find personally appealing, we judge. We categorize in black-and-white terms what is good and what is bad. It’s not uncommon for humans to fear what they don’t appreciate.
I am not here to force my idea of what works for me in a relationship on you. I just ask that you respect my ability to figure that out for myself, thank you very much.
As a writer and a journalist, Ms. Salmansohn’s article was disappointing. Because of her personal bias, she already knew the story that she wanted to write before she started writing. You can’t write the headline before you research the story. And you can’t research the story from your own life. There’s a reason that journalists don’t insert themselves into stories.
There is a story here, and I think it’s one that needs attention. But it needs objective attention, not rash value judgements based off of a failed relationship.
***
Further Reading:
“Do Open Marriages Work?” by Karen Salmansohn: http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/personal/03/23/o.open.marriages.work/
“I Ate Your Marriage with Some Fava Beans and a Nice Chianti” by Sophie Hirschfeld from Sex and Science: http://sexandscience.org/blog/?p=163
***
Sources:
Births, Marriages, Divorces, and Deaths: Provisional Data for 2008. (2009, July 29). National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(19), 1. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_19.pdf.
Knapp, J. (1976). An Exploratory Study of Seventeen Sexually Open Marriages. Journal of Sex Research, 12(3), 206. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Rubin, A., & Adams, J. (1986). Outcomes of Sexually Open Marriages. Journal of Sex Research, 22(3), 311. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Salmansohn, Karen. (2010, March 23). Do Open Marriages Work. CNN.com. Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/personal/03/23/o.open.marriages.work/.
***
DFGY5ZXF6NUH
***
someone just said that?